“Classroom equity,” “school equity,” “excellence through equity,”
“equitable practices,” etc. have all become buzzwords in the education world…some might
even call them “the latest fad in education.”
When I noticed the uptick in the usage of the word “equity” as a part of
education parlance, I immediately paid attention because it was relevant to who I
am as an education professional.
My teaching career began in 1988 in Brooklyn, NY. I did not
have language to apply to “equitable practices” in my classroom as a brand new
teacher, but it was more than evident from day one that the learning, social
and emotional needs of my students varied widely and I therefore knew
instinctively that if my students were going to be successful in my classroom,
I had better meet them where they were.
I eventually moved on to East Orange, New Jersey to continue
teaching in the city that produced me from birth. Once again, I had no language
to apply to “equity”…I simply knew that equitable classroom practices were a necessity
because the needs of my students varied. When I became a principal, although I
was no longer a classroom teacher, I was now an instructional leader. That role
in and of itself demanded that I possess an “equity mindset.”
When I say “equity mindset,” I am saying that the teacher in
the classroom has to be fair. The teacher has to consider each student as a unique individual with a focus therefore on meeting the unique needs of each and every
learner in the classroom. As the teacher examines the learning needs, the
social needs and the emotional needs of the student, the teacher is in a much
better position to meet each of these needs via bringing to each student in the
classroom an “equity mindset.” An “equality mindset” on the other hand might
not only be devastating in “real time,” but can potentially have life long adverse
implications as in the following scenario.
A baby is born into a family. She receives sustained love, care
and attention from her parents. The home environment is pleasant and there are no major challenges
such as poverty that the family has to contend with. What stands out for this
baby from the very beginning is the mother’s attention to cognitive development,
language development and listening skill development. Mother is constantly
talking and reading to the baby in the first year of her life prior to being
able to pronounce words. Eventually at around a year old, the now toddler starts
to develop a vocabulary, listening skills are developing and overall cognitive
development is intentional. Mother continues to talk and read to toddler and by the time she is three years old, she may have a
grasp of anywhere from 250 - 500 words.
At the same time another baby is born into a family. He too receives
sustained love, care and attention. This home environment is comparable to the
aforementioned home environment. The major difference between the experiences
of both babies however is the attention to cognitive development, language
development and listening skill development. Yes, this baby is loved and cared
for but the intentionality of cognitive, language and listening skill development
via purposeful talking and reading to this youngster is just not there for whatever
the reason and consequently, there is a higher probability that this toddler
will have less of a vocabulary by the age of three than the first one.
At age three, both sets pf parents enroll their toddlers into preschool and they
are in the same class. Clearly, one is behind the other relative to language development,
but to no fault of the child. What distinguishes them is essentially how they
are being raised in their home environment. Now that they are both in school,
how they proceed in the classroom will boil down to two words – “equity” and “equality.”
If the teacher brings an “equality mindset” to the classroom, both children
will suffer. In the teacher’s effort to strike a balance, the first child might
not be fully challenged predicated on her prior experience and the second child might
not be met where he is predicated on his prior experience. An equality mindset simply will not work in this or any
scenario. This scenario therefore begs an “equity mindset.” The teacher must
identify where both children are relative to their own language development and
meet them where they are toward true equity in the classroom. And just imagine if you will, that both children go for several consecutive years with "equality mindset" teachers. The gap in language development would never close and the implications would be potentially devastating...particularly for the second child.
The only place for an equality mindset in a 21st
Century classroom is a museum. It is a relic from the past and has no place in a
modern classroom. The equality mindset shortchanges children. It undermines
their ability to maximize their potential. If the playing field is going to be
truly level for all children, they must be afforded the opportunity to enter
schools and classrooms where equity abounds for everyone.
For more Principal Kafele resources, visit PrincipalKafele.com.